This study focused on the possibility of loss of competitiveness due to leakage of core technologies and information among the factors of corporate competitiveness as an analytical review of the treatment improvement and system activation of industrial security managers. From the perspective of maintaining competitiveness, industrial security managers are key assets of companies, so it is important to understand their treatment and grievances. To this end, the theoretical background of industrial security and job environment and the effect of the job environment of industrial security managers on job stress and job satisfaction were investigated. Their role as professionals in charge of national and corporate security is increasing in importance. The research method was measured through multiple regression analysis on the effect of job environment and job stress on job satisfaction by applying the two factor theory, which has been studied a lot since Herzberg (1964). As a result of the study, it was confirmed that job satisfaction of industrial security managers had a greater causal relationship with emotional and psychological factors such as job-related responsibility, sense of accomplishment, and job itself than factors such as salary, working conditions, and peer relations. This is a result of supporting Herzberg's two-factor theory and proving the importance of the job environment of an industrial security manager, a professional with high sensitivity and stress. In order to raise job-related responsibilities of industrial security managers who play a pivotal role in industrial technology security and to raise loyalty to the organization, the need to overhaul and supplement the existing system was raised. It institutionalized their mandatory employment in state-organized R&D projects and national key industries, registered and managed in the national manpower pool, and suggested policy measures to be established as a professional occupational group.